The Sikkim Bhutia Lepcha Apex Committee (SIBLAC) has warned that the weakening of Sikkim’s distinct constitutional identity could pose long-term challenges to India’s national security. Speaking to the media, SIBLAC convenor Tseten Tashi Bhutia emphasized that safeguarding Sikkim’s identity must be treated as a priority.
Bhutia pointed out that Sikkim’s unique history, legal protections, and cultural fabric form a critical part of the nation’s eastern frontier. Any erosion of this identity, he warned, could disturb regional stability.
Read More: Tripura Expands Organic Farming, Boosts Export Success
Historic Protections Under Threat
Sikkim, which joined the Indian Union in 1975, enjoys special protections under Article 371F of the Constitution. These provisions safeguard the rights of indigenous communities and recognize historical treaties.
However, Bhutia argued that recent administrative and legal developments have begun to dilute these protections. He cited the broadening of definitions around Sikkimese identity and alleged encroachments on land rights and local institutions.
He added, “The identity of the original inhabitants is being weakened. If this continues, it will erode the foundations of peace and cooperation in the region.”
Identity and Security Interlinked
The safeguarding of Sikkim’s identity is not just about protecting culture, Bhutia said, but also about maintaining India’s strategic interests. The state borders China, Nepal, and Bhutan, and plays a vital role in the security architecture of the Northeast.
“Sikkim is more than a state—it’s a buffer. Any internal instability here could be exploited by hostile actors,” he cautioned.
This concern comes amid heightened geopolitical tensions along the India-China border and growing external interest in the Northeast.
Youth Participation and Awareness Urged
SIBLAC has called on Sikkimese youth to take an active role in understanding and protecting their legal rights. The group plans to organize awareness workshops, legal literacy drives, and heritage campaigns in educational institutions.
“We cannot rely on the government alone. The youth must know the value of their roots and constitutional guarantees,” Bhutia said.
He also encouraged scholars and civil society members to conduct fresh studies on the socio-legal implications of recent judicial and demographic shifts in Sikkim.
Need for Legal and Policy Safeguards
The SIBLAC convenor urged both the state and central governments to reaffirm their commitment to Article 371F and reexamine policies that may threaten Sikkim’s special status.
He called for stricter implementation of land laws, protection of traditional institutions like the Dzumsa system, and the formation of a high-level review committee.
According to Bhutia, these steps are vital not just for internal harmony, but also for national unity and strategic preparedness.
Broader Civil Society Response
Several cultural and student organizations have echoed SIBLAC’s concerns. They expressed support for a renewed push to uphold indigenous rights and respect Sikkim’s unique political evolution.
Leaders from the Bhutia and Lepcha communities emphasized that identity preservation must go hand in hand with development, not be sacrificed for it.
The call to action from SIBLAC underscores the rising urgency around safeguarding Sikkim’s identity. As the state sits on a crucial geopolitical frontier, maintaining its legal and cultural stability has wider implications for India’s national integrity.
With rising awareness and organized civil efforts, the issue now requires a clear and proactive response from both state and central authorities.
Read More: Arunachal Biodiversity Project Gets Full Backing from Centre
