A leaked audio conversation allegedly involving Prag News owner Sanjive Narain and businessman Nayan Ghosh has triggered a major controversy in Assam. Ghosh has accused Narain of demanding money to prevent the television channel from broadcasting the second part of a report linking him to alleged drug trafficking.
Narain has denied the allegation, claiming that their conversation concerned a Mercedes-Benz car transaction. The controversy has raised questions about media accountability, the credibility of the original allegations and the role of Assam Police. However, the authenticity and complete context of the leaked recording remain independently unverified.
Read More: Mizoram concert economy now attracts private event players
Key Facts About the Assam Audio Controversy
- Location: Assam, with the controversy involving Guwahati-based media and business circles.
- People involved: Prag News owner Sanjive Narain and businessman Nayan Ghosh.
- Main allegation: Ghosh claims Narain demanded money to stop further negative news coverage.
- Narain’s response: He says the conversation concerned a Mercedes-Benz car purchase.
- Police response: The Commissioner of Police, Guwahati, declined to comment when approached by India Today.
- Current status: The competing allegations remain unverified, and an independent investigation could help establish the facts.
Leaked Audio Sparks Controversy in Assam
The controversy began after an audio recording purportedly featuring Narain and Ghosh circulated publicly. Ghosh alleged that the conversation concerned a demand for money in exchange for preventing Prag News from broadcasting the second part of a report against him.
The channel had previously aired a report alleging Ghosh’s involvement in drug trafficking. Ghosh has denied the accusation and described the reports against him as false and fabricated.
Narain addressed the controversy at a press conference after the recording went viral. Although he acknowledged speaking with Ghosh, he rejected the claim that he had sought money to suppress news coverage.
According to Narain, he knew Ghosh as a customer of his Mercedes-Benz dealership in Guwahati. He also stated that he learned about the allegations against the businessman only after Prag News broadcast its report.
However, the audio circulating publicly does not explicitly mention a car purchase. This has left the purpose of the conversation open to competing interpretations.
What Does the Leaked Conversation Allegedly Reveal?
In the recording, Narain is purportedly heard asking Ghosh why several people, including his own editors, disliked him.
He then allegedly refers to the second part of the report, saying that the channel was prepared to broadcast it but that he had managed to delay its transmission.
During the exchange, Narain purportedly says that he persuaded his editors to hold back the report because Ghosh would send the bastu, an Assamese word that can mean a thing or an object. He then appears to ask Ghosh to send it quickly.
Ghosh reportedly responds that he would speak to the person responsible for handling his money and arrange for that person to contact Narain. He also asks Narain to take the call.
The meaning of the exchange remains disputed. While Narain maintains that the discussion concerned a vehicle transaction, Ghosh claims the reference was to money demanded to prevent further adverse reporting.
Neither interpretation has been conclusively established. The recording’s authenticity, completeness and wider context also remain unverified.
Nayan Ghosh Denies Drug Trafficking Allegations
Ghosh, who is currently outside Assam, has released a video denying any involvement in drug trafficking. He has described himself as a businessman and reiterated his allegation that Narain sought money to stop reports he considers false.
Ghosh has also claimed that he previously approached the courts over allegedly inaccurate reports broadcast by Prag News and obtained a restraint order against the channel.
India Today has not independently verified this claim. The court proceedings and the allegations surrounding the audio would need further examination to establish the relevant facts.
Meanwhile, Narain has announced plans to approach the courts against Ghosh over the alleged leak and against news organisations that broadcast the recording. He has accused them of damaging his reputation and questioned the integrity of the audio.
Questions Raised About Assam Police
The controversy has also brought the role of Assam Police into focus, particularly given Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma’s repeated statements about a zero-tolerance approach to drug trafficking.
One major question is whether Prag News had credible evidence to support its allegations against Ghosh. If such evidence existed, it remains important to establish whether the channel shared it with the police and whether the authorities registered a case or initiated an investigation.
The leaked conversation also reportedly includes Ghosh claiming that several police officials had forwarded him clips of the news reports aired against him.
If verified, this claim could warrant clarification about the nature of the communications. However, forwarding news clips alone does not establish misconduct by any police official.
India Today approached the Assam Police to ask whether the authorities would examine the controversy, including the drug-trafficking allegations and the alleged demand for money to suppress news coverage. The Commissioner of Police, Guwahati, declined to comment.
Could the Alleged Demand for Money Lead to Legal Action?
Ghosh’s allegation raises serious questions about whether adverse news coverage was allegedly used to seek money from a person targeted by the reporting.
If an investigation establishes that fabricated allegations were deliberately used to obtain money in exchange for withholding a report, the conduct could raise questions of extortion or other criminal offences, depending on the evidence and applicable law.
However, the existence of a leaked recording and conflicting statements does not, by itself, prove that a crime occurred. Investigators would need to establish the recording’s authenticity, the context of the conversation, the purpose of any proposed payment and the conduct of the individuals involved.
Similarly, the drug-trafficking allegations against Ghosh require credible evidence and appropriate legal scrutiny rather than assumptions based solely on media reports.
Why the Controversy Matters for Assam
The dispute extends beyond a disagreement between a media owner and a businessman. It raises broader concerns about editorial independence, responsible reporting and the potential misuse of media influence.
In Assam, where drug trafficking remains a significant public policy concern, allegations of this nature require careful handling. Authorities must distinguish between credible reporting that may assist law enforcement and unsubstantiated accusations that could damage an individual’s reputation.
The case also highlights the importance of transparent procedures for addressing allegations against media organisations and ensuring that complaints receive appropriate legal consideration.
An independent examination of the available evidence could clarify whether the original reports had a factual basis, whether the leaked conversation was accurately represented and whether any offence warrants further investigation.
Questions and Answers
What is the Assam leaked audio controversy about?
The controversy involves an audio recording allegedly featuring Prag News owner Sanjive Narain and businessman Nayan Ghosh. Ghosh claims Narain demanded money to prevent further adverse reporting, while Narain says the conversation concerned a Mercedes-Benz purchase.
Has Sanjive Narain admitted demanding money?
No. Narain has rejected the allegation and offered a different explanation for the conversation.
Has Nayan Ghosh denied the drug-trafficking allegations?
Yes. Ghosh has publicly denied involvement in drug trafficking and described the reports against him as fabricated.
Has Assam Police announced an investigation?
No confirmed investigation was established in the information available in the report. The Commissioner of Police, Guwahati, declined to comment when approached by India Today.
What happens next?
The next steps depend on whether the authorities examine the competing allegations, verify the audio recording and determine whether the available evidence warrants further legal action.
Conclusion
The leaked audio controversy involving Sanjive Narain and Nayan Ghosh has raised serious questions about media accountability, allegations of drug trafficking and the possible misuse of news coverage. However, the claims made by both sides remain disputed, and the recording’s authenticity and context have not been independently established.
A fair and evidence-based investigation would help determine the facts, protect legitimate journalistic activity and ensure accountability if any wrongdoing is proven.
Also Read: Manipur BSF chief now meets CM after deadly clashes
